31 comments

Tim Hortons Canada: $1 Flavoured Latte until February 19th

Posted by & filed under Canadian Deals & Coupons.

tims-latte-2
@TimHortons
To intro­duce their new lattes, Tim Hor­tons is offer­ing a 10oz Flavoured Latte for only $1 (plus tax). Lattes are made from 100% Ara­bica beans and warm frothy milk and come in flavours such as caramel, vanilla, hazel­nut or mint choco­late. Visit their face­book page to take the per­son­al­ity quiz to see what flavour is for you.

This offer is only avail­able until Feb­ru­ary 19th at par­tic­i­pat­ing Tim Hor­tons. I couldn’t find any infor­ma­tion on calo­rie and fat count for these lattes and I would be curi­ous to know. The flavours can pack a punch and at $1 it is way too easy to over indulge.

31 Responses to “Tim Hortons Canada: $1 Flavoured Latte until February 19th”

  1. Natalka

    Flavoured Hot Latte Supreme (Small) 190 cal
    5g sat­u­rated fat
    .2 trans­fat
    130mg sodium
    26g sugar (over 6 tsp sugar)

    Flavoured Hot Latte Supreme (Large) 290 cal
    240g sodium
    same fat as above
    42 g sugar (over 10 tsp sugar)

    (oth­ers are on the Tim’s site, under espresso bevs.

    Plain Hot Latte (Small) 80 cal
    .1g sat­u­rated fat
    120g sodium
    12g sugar

    I don’t think I’ll go for these, but I’m sure my son will.

  2. Nettie

    I’ve only tried their ver­sion of “Chai Tea Latte”, and it was.…..gross.….to say the least. I think the term “watered down ditch water” was tossed around a few times.

    I really want to like these, as the clos­est Star Bucks is 2.5 hours away.

    Has any­one had any of the other fla­vors? Are they any better?

  3. Anisa

    one of their small fla­vored lattes are 190 calo­ries accord­ing to the nutri­tional cal­cu­la­tor on their site. (they are listed under espresso beverages)

  4. Samantha

    If you go on the Tim Horton’s web­site nutri­tion cal­cu­la­tor, you can find the info on any­thing they carry, most of the time. The lattes are under the espresso bev­er­ages. The plain lattes have 80 calo­ries and 0.2 g of fat for the size on pro­mo­tion right now (the new small), and the flavoured lattes auto­mat­i­cally come with one sugar in them, so this size would have 115 calo­ries and 0.2 g of fat. They actu­ally have fewer calo­ries and fat than a small dou­ble dou­ble, and only 5 calo­ries MORE than a small reg­u­lar, but still lower in fat!

  5. Samantha

    Sorry, I meant 5 calo­ries more for the plain latte. It would be about 40 calo­ries more than a small reg­u­lar for a flavoured latte, though you are able to order them with no sugar.

  6. Tinmack

    Had a buck vanilla latte yes­ter­day — tastes like glop from a machine, which is exactly what it is. I’m stick­ing with Rot­ten Ron­nies for a latte(when they have a B0G0 coupon) and my cof­fee maker for reg­u­lar cof­fee. As well, Tim Hor­tons is get­ting con­fus­ing — the order wall is cov­ered with too much stuff. Rot­ten Ron­nies frozen cof­fee blows away Tim­mies iced cap as well. Hope the buck iced cof­fee returns in the summer.

  7. Melissa

    I tried the vanilla one today and it tasted like hot water with foam. I’ll stick to Star­bucks for my lattes and Mcdon­alds for my coffee.

  8. Sally

    I posted this last week but leav­ing it up since theres so many com­ments. I had one yes­ter­day. Disgusting!

  9. Dani

    I don’t have their lattes. I stick with tea or cof­fee when I’m there, and save my latte-buying for the real cafe (where they have sugar-free syrup and soy. I am THAT cof­fee drinker.) 190 calo­ries for a small is too much, regard­less of price.

  10. cinn

    is the carmel one good? has any­one tried it? because i LOVED star­bucks carmel brulee.

  11. saver

    mis­take for them to branch out into this area, dont much like their lattes. they should have stuck with what they are good at…making a great cup of reg­u­lar coffee.

  12. Crystal

    I had a caramel one yes­ter­day, ter­ri­ble. no where near star­bucks caramel brulees. will not be going back for another Tims latte.

  13. tina

    this tastes really bad. I would def­i­nitely rec­om­mend u save that dol­lar to put toward a latte at Star­bucks or sec­ond cup. Def­i­nitely not the best bang for your buck. I took one sip and in the garbage it went.

  14. shawnmikey716

    Big waste of a $1! I had a vanilla one yes­ter­day, nasted like milk foamed in hot water, not sure where the vanilla was but it wasn’t in my cup! The ones pic­tured are the supreme and not the ones on for the $1.It was dis­gust­ing and I will not try again.

  15. shawnmikey716

    Sorry that should have said “tasted” but nasted seems like a good def­i­n­i­tion :)

  16. Meeeeee23

    Had the choco­late mint latte today.…..wasn’t too bad. Can’t com­plain for $1. I’d pay up to maybe $2 for it.

  17. Ray

    Melissa: “I’ll stick to Star­bucks for my lattes and Mcdon­alds for my coffee.”

    Marry me?

  18. Stephanie

    I am drink­ing a caramel one right now. Costed me $1.68 for a small (prob­a­bly not $1 because I got the whipped cream). It’s not bad, but McDonald’s lattes are bet­ter. And Sec­ond Cup (although pricey) is even bet­ter than those. Star­bucks gives me diar­rhea so no thanks!

  19. NB

    YUCK. I had one today. Thought I’d give it the ben­e­fit of the doubt despite the posts here. I had to add 2 packs of sugar to it for it to even be some­what drink­able. I had the vanilla latte. NEVER again.…blech.

  20. lisa

    my sis works at one and she told me it is skim milk pow­der and ground espresso with hot water and sugar for sweet­ened with or with­out fla­vor i liked the lattes they had when it was real 2% milk and espresso beans and syrup this new one blows. i will not buy one

  21. not brainwashed

    you can get a tin of maxwell­house flavoured cof­fee for as low as $3.99 ($2.49 on sale). one tin makes up to 20 cups. way bet­ter bar­gain than tim’s any­thing. plus, tim’s crap are laced with excess sugar. BAD for your teeth.

  22. young money

    Reg­u­lar small latte $1.12 includ­ing tax in b.c. Canada. I cant com­plain. I put a pack of splenda in it and its even bet­ter. The flavoured lattes prob­a­bly no good with all that sugar. Stick tithe reg­u­lar small lattes!

  23. Chris

    Bought one today. Gross. Asked the server if it was from a mix or if it was real espresso and steamed milk. VERY con­fus­ing con­ver­sa­tion. She told me it was a pow­der. Still not sure how these are made. I will stick to Star­bucks and McDs.

  24. timboss

    lattes are made from pow­dered skim milk, pow­dered cof­fee — 1 sugar is added for the flavoured ones — sugar on request for plain — so shouldn’t be sweet — flavour shots have 0 sugar. Supremes are $1.60 plus tax for small, reg­u­lar or flavoured are $1.00 for small. I used to have tea lattes when using 2% milk — no more — if I wanted tea with milk, I would get tea with milk.

  25. gwennie

    love the new lattes had my first the other day and have been drink­ing them ever since
    Thanks Tim­mies you did it again

  26. Brad

    I gave tim Hor­tons the ben­e­fit of the doubt…my first Latte was awe­ful, i had to had sugar to drink it (and I drink Star­buck bold cof­fee with no sugar). But I thought maybe I shouldn’t have ordered plain, so a few days later my wife and I had two fla­vored lattes (mint choco­late and caramel). We couldn’t even fin­ish them…they are so bit­ter and off! I wish I knew how to describe it, but trust me they are awe­ful. Star­bucks and McDon­alds both make way bet­ter spe­cialty coffee!

  27. Wendy C

    I reg­u­larly buy plain lattes and love them! No added sugar. Lots of flavour. Yummmmmmmy!!!!

  28. Dylan

    haha, I worked for tim­mies for 2 years (work at star­bucks now) and watched them go down hill pretty fast. The lattes used to be real milk, real espresso, and a sug­ary base, but they were drinkable.

    I ran into tim­mies a few months ago, and see­ing the new latte signs every­where, I thought they were just re-launching their espresso drinks… no. they replaced the old espresso machines with brand new nes­tle instant latte machines. After try­ing my drink, and essen­tially spit­ting it back up, I asked the girl at the till how they were made, being curi­ous as I had just quit a month before. Essen­tially it’s a glo­ri­fied hot choco­late machine that spits out milk pow­der, instant cof­fee and water. no “espresso”. the only rea­son they can call it espresso is because it’s an “espresso roast”.

    any­body famil­iar with what a cap­puc­cino actu­ally is would know that it’s pretty much a latte but equal parts milk, equal parts foam. That’s the way a tim­mies cap­puc­cino used to be, but now you can either get a latte, which tastes like a fla­vor­less sugar pow­der in hot water, topped with milk “froth” (which is fricken dis­gust­ing btw). If you want more “cof­fee taste” you can get a cap­puc­cino… I can see why it’s not equal parts “hot milk” and “milky froth”. that would be disgusting.

    Mcdon­alds has much higher drip cof­fee, and stun­ningly high qual­ity espresso bev­er­ages (for a fast food joint at least)compared to Tim Hor­tons. They even give you a choice of milk ;)

    don’t even get me started on the “real fruit” smooth­ies. The base was the same sim­ple syrup we used to thin out the donut fon­dant. They pretty much came out with it because it was a dirt cheap way to make a ton of money.

    Nothing’s fresh at Tim Hor­tons. except for the cook­ies… kinda. if frozen dough is fresh? HAHA I can only imag­ine how the new “lasagna casse­role” is shipped to the store. sooooo gross.

    but you get what you pay for right?

Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>